'All Conflict in Literature Is, in Its Simplest Form, a Struggle Between Good and Evil Essay\r'

'â€Å"All passage of arms in literature is, in its simplest form, a struggle mingled with genuine and demonic. ” This debate squiffys that all the themes and struggles in literature, when scummy down to their around simplest forms, are a manageing between good and evil. ordinarily in conflicts, there are 2 nerves that fight over one thing. i side is considered good, temporary hookup the other side is considered detrimental. The commonwealth that are good do it for the right thing while the people that are bad do it for the unseasonable reasons. This is considered to be in every conflict when carefully analyzed.\r\nThis direction is not binding because a conflict does not fox to be about good and evil. A conflict brush off be internal, where a struggle squanders place in the shell’s mind. some(prenominal)thing hatful happen to a suit that emotional scars him or her, or cause mental instability. Also, there can be a conflict between two sides notwithstanding it does not mean either one is good or evil. For interpreter, two sides are fighting each other to gain territory from the other. neither is good or bad because they fight for the same reason, downing the other to take what they take a crap.\r\n genius good example of a book that proves this is The catcher in the Rye, by J. D. Salinger. In this book, the important character Holden Caulfield is faced with several conflicts. Some of these conflicts include conflicts with himself and conflicts with society. Holden has a hard season dealing with everyday life and secludes himself from the outback(a) world. He believes everyone around him is phony but in actuality, Holden is the biggest phony. Most of this is caused from the death of his comrade which made him mentally instable.\r\nThe conflict in this story is not about good and evil, but the fact that the main character is unable to deal with others because of the way he views things. Another book that proves t his is The Iliad, by Homer. in that respect is no good or bad in this story, because each of the characters are caught in their own conflicts. On the Greek side, Menelaus fates to defeat the trojan horses and take Helen back while Agamemnon wants to take over Trojan territory. On the Trojan side, Hector wants to get rid of the Greeks while Paris wants to keep Helen. Achilles does not want to get involved in the war but he fights for the Greeks to avenge his cousin-german’s death.\r\nThese chain of conflicts all puzzle from Helen leaving the Trojans for Paris, which leads to the war between the Greeks and Trojans. Although most conflicts are between good and evil, they do not have to be. The first example used shows that conflicts can be internal, where a problem occurs in the character’s mind through which the character reaches a new understanding of things. The second example shows that conflicts do not have to have a good or evil in them, conflict is caused becau se of personal reasons. The statement given may seem on-key but after analyzing several books, it can be proved to be false.\r\n'