The Validity of Cognitive Dissonance Theory Essay examples -- communic

Description of TheoryThe term stochasticity refers to when one cognitive fraction is inconsistent with another cognitive element according to the lecture notes of Professor Soreno. Cognitive elements can be categorize in four groups called article of beliefs, attitudes, values, and perceptions of behavior. Beliefs can be defined as a perception that something exists or not. This perception can range from a telephone exchange or peripheral type of belief. The more central a belief is, the harder it is to change that belief. An attitude describes the positive or negative feelings we have toward people, things, or ideas. Values are beliefs that are so important to a person, that they lots guide a persons life. There are cardinal types of values, instrumental and terminal. Perceptions of behavior simply refer to the interpretation of actions by another. For example, when individual waves at a person, in America, it is often perceived as a friendly gesture. When two of these cogni tive elements are incongruent, it leads to dissonance, which can very in intensity. People often experience dissonance on a mundane basis, but because it is so minute, it is not bothersome. The Cognitive racket theory deals with these gauzy occurrences, but for the sake of understanding, extreme examples help to explain the theory in better detail.According to Festinger, all of the cognitive elements held the same value in producing cognitive dissonance, but some scholars have challenged his theory. In the book, The Handbook of pauperization Science, the authors claim that attitude cognitive element holds a heavier value all over the other elements by saying it can change the behavior of a person. They quote, In experimental tests of the theory, knowledge about recent behavior is usua... ...s chat studies continue, there will be more tests and conclusions on the Cognitive Dissonance theory that will reveal more about human communication. later on all, learning how we communi cate with each other is how we are able to aim as a society. ReferencesHarmon-Jones, E. (2008). Cognitive Dissonance Theory. In J. Shah, W. Gardener, & V. Gardener, Handbook of motivational Science (pp. 71-83). New York City The Guilford Press.Helwig-Larson, M., & Collins, B. (1997, April 1). A Social Psychological position on the Role of Knowledge about assist in AIDS Prevention. Current Directions in Psychological Science , Vol. 6 (No. 2).Lepper, M. R., & Greene, D. (1975). Turning merriment into Work Effects of Adult Surveillance and Extrinsic Rewards on Childrens immanent Motivation. Journal ol Personality and Social Psychology , Vol. 31, 479-486.