Pluralism vs. Elitism in Public Policy Making Essay

Pluralism vs. Elitism in Public Policy Making - Essay ExampleThe elitist view of power, on the other go through states that semipolitical power should be in the hands of a relatively small part of the general population that shares a common understanding or so the funda manpowertal issues facing society and government3. Those who advocate the elitist view of power argue that the general public is best served when a basic consensus exists among a sylvans top leaders regarding fundamental issues. Although these leaders may disagree on minor issues, or even compete against one another for positions of potential in government, the fact that they share a common view on issues that might otherwise split the nation is regarded as an important foundation for disposal4. With the practice of democracy in the fall in States as the principal basis of such claims by pluralists and elitists, is it safe to say that equality under the law is enforced in the face of political, social, and rel igious diversity among men, and the conflicting interests of their representatives? The Dispersal of Power among Groups Pluralism gives stress on the role of interest groups in political agendas in the United States. ... They further emphasize that politics is not the central decision-making of a united public acting through the state, but the result of continuous competition, bargaining, and exchange among groups representing dissimilar interests. Pluralists accepted Schumpeters broad view that what separate democracies from non-democracies are the methods by which government officials are elected. Democracy, in the United States of America, is generally regarded as synonymous to political pluralism despite the rise of scholarly notions that say otherwise. For Weber, elite domination within the state apparatus was inevitable. As Weber himself puts it, all ideas aiming at abolishing dominance of men over men are illusory5. The crucial feature of the state is located within its role s as the major authoritative associated within a abandoned territory. For the state to maintain its central position it has to claim a monopoly of the legitimate use of force. Domination, or as Weber termed it, the authoritarian power of command is a necessary and inevitable feature of this process. However, the concentration of both economic and political decision making in the hands of a central government bureaucracy is incompatible with democracy. Democracy requires limited government, individual freedom, and dispersal of power in society On September 17, 1787 the Constitution of the United States of America was approved and instituted the chase fundamental principles (1) standard sovereignty, or control by the people, (2) a republican government in which the people select representatives to make decisions for them, (3) limited government with pen laws, separation of powers, with checks and balances among branches to prevent any one branch from gaining too much power, and