The Government And Environmental Policy Essays -- essays research pape

The Government and Environmental PolicyThe project of the United States public polity law is to implement restrictionsin an swither to solve problems, which can be seen with the Clean wet Act.Public policy has also been employed to reform the Endangered Species Act of1973. Although the United States regimen is noble in its efforts topreserve the environment through these acts, the internal social system of rules of publicpolicy practic all toldy retards these acts effectiveness. This paper will explore the umteen ways in which factors such as plain capital punishment, divided government,and otherwise forms of public policy expunge the environmental legislation involvedwith the same acts. The main factors involved with the EndangeredSpecies Act of 1973 involve horizontal implementation structure and dividedgovernment. Before one can discuss how these policies affect environmentallegislation, a brief description of each must rootage be lucidly explained. Whenour governm ent was founded, a system of checks and balances was implemented amongst the executive, judicial, and legislative branches to ensure that no onepart of government gets as well as much power. Although this limits the power of anyone person in government, it often slows down the ability of government becausea consensus can be herculean with so many people working together. Anotherproblem is that in that respect are many subgovernments affecting the legislation as well,such as interest groups like the Sierra Club, Administrative Agents like theEnvironmental egis Agency, and Congressional Committees. Because thesegroups add to the total number of people working on the legislation, theoriginal noble ideology of making policy for the good of the race is voided.Also because there are so many differences of opinion, few forceful changes aremade, instead small incremental changes are made which obligate up lots of time andretard the effectiveness and enforcement of the legislation. In improver tothis chaotic turmoil, four steps must be implemented in order to pass a bill.These are initiation & definition, grammatical construction & enactment (legitimation),implementation, and evaluation.The most relevant one of these steps is horizontal implementation when oneconsiders the Endangered Species Act and Clean Water Act. This policy is theprocess that puts a law into effect after it has been legitimized. Congres... ...ne." (Adler, pg. 1)The Acts goals as set(p) forth by Congress was to eliminate toxic discharge into material bodies of water by 1985, improve water quality for marine and freshwater life by 1983, and for all "toxic pollutants in toxic amounts" intowater. Of race that act has had mediocre success, and only through continuedcooperation of the governments branches will pull ahead progress be made. Inconclusion, it has been shown how different branches of government, differentadministrations, and different policies all worked togethe r to retard theimplementation of the Endangered Species Act and the Clean Water Act of theearly 1970s. Although these processes do act in a system of governmentalchecks and balances as the founders of this country wished, the effectiveness ofthe acts take many old age of careful compromising to become significant.REFERENCES1. Adler, Robert W., et. al. The Clean Water Act 20 Years Later      Island Press Washington, D.C. 19932. Horton, Tom "The Endangered Species Act also tough, too weak,      toolate."      (1992) Audubon Vol. 94 pgs. 68-74